DeBoville Slough, May 3, 2009
Shot with two cameras, a Canon EOS A2E with Kodak Ektar 100 colour film and a Rolleiflex with Fuji Acros 100 black and white film.
Some of the colour photos were shot with a Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 lens which, while being a "digital" lens, can work at 15-16mm without vignetting on a 35mm camera. 16mm is actually kind of too wide for landscapes and I much prefer the 28mm of my Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 which I shot the other colour photos with.
Ektar 100 looks great. The grain is so fine that I can't even see any when I scan a negative at 2400 dpi. All I see is individual pixels, so the grain is smaller than a pixel at that resolution. Don't know about the supposed vivid colour since it wasn't exactly a majorly colourful day.
As a public safety announcement, don't walk along the edge of the trail while looking through the viewfinder with a wide-angle lens. I nearly fell off the trail twice that way.
Read MoreSome of the colour photos were shot with a Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 lens which, while being a "digital" lens, can work at 15-16mm without vignetting on a 35mm camera. 16mm is actually kind of too wide for landscapes and I much prefer the 28mm of my Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 which I shot the other colour photos with.
Ektar 100 looks great. The grain is so fine that I can't even see any when I scan a negative at 2400 dpi. All I see is individual pixels, so the grain is smaller than a pixel at that resolution. Don't know about the supposed vivid colour since it wasn't exactly a majorly colourful day.
As a public safety announcement, don't walk along the edge of the trail while looking through the viewfinder with a wide-angle lens. I nearly fell off the trail twice that way.
19 / 28
DeBovilleSlough0503200919
treesnaturewater35mmriveriso100coquitlamcanoneosa2etamron2875f28debovillesloughkodakektar100
- No Comments